<?xml version='1.0' encoding='us-ascii'?>
<eml:eml scope="system" system="https://dataportal.senckenberg.de" packageId="e36b1fef-d168-474d-91f0-e50aa6ce4983" xsi:schemaLocation="https://eml.ecoinformatics.org/eml-2.2.0" xmlns:eml="https://eml.ecoinformatics.org/eml-2.2.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><dataset><title>Neighbourhood effects and demographic rates of Protea species, Fynbos, Cape Floral Region, South Afrika, 02.2011-09.2012</title><creator><individualName><givenName>Henning</givenName><surName>Nottebrock</surName></individualName><organizationName>Plant and Landscape Ecology, University of Hohenheim</organizationName><address /></creator><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>Henning</givenName><surName>Nottebrock</surName></individualName><role>associatedParty</role></associatedParty><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>Frank</givenName><surName>Schurr</surName></individualName><role>Co-owner</role></associatedParty><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>Baptiste</givenName><surName>Schmid</surName></individualName><role>Co-owner</role></associatedParty><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>Matthias</givenName><surName>Schleuning</surName></individualName><role>Co-owner</role></associatedParty><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>Katrin</givenName><surName>B&#246;hning-Gaese</surName></individualName><role>Co-owner</role></associatedParty><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>J&#246;rn</givenName><surName>Pagel</surName></individualName><role>Co-owner</role></associatedParty><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>Martina</givenName><surName>Treurnicht</surName></individualName><role>Custodian/Steward</role></associatedParty><associatedParty><individualName><givenName>Karen</givenName><surName>Esler</surName></individualName><role>Custodian/Steward</role></associatedParty><pubDate>2016-09-08</pubDate><abstract><para>We set up 27 study plots (120x120m) in the Fynbos, Western Cape and mapped all Protea shrubs taller than 30cm. On 2157 focal plants of 22 Protea species on all sites (Protea acuminata, P. aurea, P. burchellii, P. coronata, P. compacta, P. cynaroides, P. eximia, P. grandiceps, P. laurifolia, P. lepidocarpodendron, P. longifolia, P. lorifolia, P. magnifica, P. mundii, P. nana, P. neriifolia, P. nitida, P. obtusifolia, P. punctata, P. repens, P. speciosa, P. susannae) we measured the canopy seed bank size. For all individuals we counted the number of matured cones and measured the plant size and on 1755 focal individuals we counted number of cones, fertile seeds per cone, total number of ovules per cone, predation rate and seed mass. We created neighborhood models and investigated spatial effects of resources (seed crops and plant size, respectively) provided by the Protea plants in the study sites on the predation rate and on total number of matured cones. For more details see Nottebrock et al. 2016 Oikos (DOI: 10.1111/oik.03438).</para></abstract><keywordSet><keyword>community dynamics</keyword><keyword>competition</keyword><keyword>fynbos western cape</keyword><keyword>plant coexistence</keyword><keyword>plant-animal interactions</keyword><keyword>predation</keyword><keyword>protea proteaceae</keyword></keywordSet><intellectualRights><para>Obtain permission from data set owner(s)</para></intellectualRights><coverage><geographicCoverage><geographicDescription>Western Cape, South Africa</geographicDescription><boundingCoordinates><westBoundingCoordinate>19.1008</westBoundingCoordinate><eastBoundingCoordinate>19.5147</eastBoundingCoordinate><northBoundingCoordinate>-33.6286</northBoundingCoordinate><southBoundingCoordinate>-34.6139</southBoundingCoordinate></boundingCoordinates></geographicCoverage><temporalCoverage><rangeOfDates><beginDate><calendarDate>2011-02-01</calendarDate></beginDate><endDate><calendarDate>2012-09-01</calendarDate></endDate></rangeOfDates></temporalCoverage><taxonomicCoverage><generalTaxonomicCoverage /><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea acuminata</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea aurea</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea burchellii</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea coronata</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea compacta</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea cynaroides</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea eximia</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea grandiceps</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea laurifolia</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea lepidocarpodendron</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea longifolia</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea lorifolia</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea magnifica</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea mundii</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea nana</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea neriifolia</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea nitida</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea obtusifolia</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea punctata</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea repens</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea speciosa</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification><taxonomicClassification><taxonRankName>Species</taxonRankName><taxonRankValue>Protea susannae</taxonRankValue></taxonomicClassification></taxonomicCoverage></coverage><contact><individualName><givenName>Henning</givenName><surName>Nottebrock</surName></individualName><organizationName>Plant and Landscape Ecology, University of Hohenheim</organizationName><address /><electronicMailAddress>henning@nottebrock.net</electronicMailAddress></contact><methods><methodStep><description><section><title>Mapping of Protea communities and measuring cone number and predation rate</title><para>We mapped all individuals taller than 30 cm of 22 Protea species on 27 different sites with a highly precise dGPS; in total 49990 Protea individuals. We measured cone number and predation rate of 2157 and 1755 focal individuals in the core zone of 100x100m with a 10m buffer, respectively. Moreover we measured canopy seed bank sizes: we counted the cones, harvested 5 randomly selected cones and cut them open with secetures to count the number of fertile seeds, total number of ovules, seed mass and seed size. Out of this we calculated the potential number of fertile seeds per plant (seed crop). We related these demographic measurements to neighbourhood analyses from individual-based maps. Neighbourhood analyses include different neighbourhood effects. To analyse cone number and predation rate we used conspecific and heterospecific neighbourhood effects, neutral neighbourhood effects (all individuals) and, in addition, these neighbourhood effects indicated by plant size or seed crop, respectively. For more details see Nottebrock et al. 2016 Oikos (DOI: 10.1111/oik.03438).</para></section></description></methodStep></methods></dataset><additionalMetadata><metadata><temporalDataType>timeslices</temporalDataType></metadata></additionalMetadata><additionalMetadata><metadata><temporalDataInfo /></metadata></additionalMetadata><additionalMetadata><metadata><temporalResolution>daily</temporalResolution></metadata></additionalMetadata><additionalMetadata><metadata><temporalResolutionInfo /></metadata></additionalMetadata><additionalMetadata><metadata><climaticNiche /></metadata></additionalMetadata><additionalMetadata><metadata><ecologicalTraits /></metadata></additionalMetadata><additionalMetadata><metadata><environmentalForcingData /></metadata></additionalMetadata></eml:eml>